Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Dean's avatar

I want to like Walker better, but I don't think you can pay a RB in the vicinity of top 5 money in the NFL if he's a passing down liability. Can't block, can't catch, can't run routes, can't reliably be played on passing downs. And that means we are tipping our hands a bit with whether or not he's on the field sometimes. And while he is a good if not very good runner, I don't think he's proven he belongs in the elite category there either. Just doesn't make sense for me, not for our situation and the number of needs this roster still has.

I'm with you that I'd prefer to pay Hall if it's a choice between the two. But I suspect I'm also with you that we shouldn't pay either. Don't get me wrong, he's an exciting play maker and I'll be excited to see what he can do if we do bring him in. But I'd also be pretty content if we just brought back CRod and McNichols with some later round draft pick/UFAs/budget FAs getting a shot to make the roster. I'd rather spend elsewhere and I think those two and Bill are a solid RB room.

I know there are reports that the tides are turning and more top offenses are heavily built around an elite RB, but I'd still rather see the money spent elsewhere. And I'm not convinced Hall is worth top RB money either.

Some more budget friendly options to consider might include Etienne and Javonte if they are available and for less than 10 mil. There are a bunch of guys who are either unproven or have to prove it again that should be available for real value deals like Pacheco, Dobbins, Dowdle, Allgeier. Not convinced any of them would for sure earn much play time over the three guys we had last year, but all have the upside at least and should be cheap enough to not hurt if they don't hit that potential.

Jason's avatar

What are your thoughts on Kenneth Gainwell?

27 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?